| |||||||||||||
Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?Posted Jun 1, 2012 8:39 UTC (Fri) by geertj (subscriber, #4116)Parent article: Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
Maybe atime could be updated in-place, if atime is the only metadata update to an inode? The implication would be that atime in snapshots would change. But maybe that's something that could be accepted as a compromise?
(Log in to post comments)
Atime and btrfs: a bad combination? Posted Jun 1, 2012 9:43 UTC (Fri) by bergwolf (subscriber, #55931) [Link]
Updating atime in a snapshot breaks its design and is dangerous if snapshot is taken for backup purpose.
|
|||||||||||||