LWN.net Logo

Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Remove useless 4 bytes of padding from every event

From:  Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org>
To:  Steven Rostedt <rostedt-AT-goodmis.org>
Subject:  Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Remove useless 4 bytes of padding from every event
Date:  Wed, 16 May 2012 13:04:22 -0700
Message-ID:  <CA+55aFyKiNBRv=z8JjPTu=yFFvyWHhkGDxjWLm=R4HpwXzEw4g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:  LKML <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan-AT-linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-AT-gmail.com>, David Sharp <dhsharp-AT-google.com>, Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik-AT-google.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz-AT-infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>
Archive-link:  Article, Thread

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> Seriously though. What's your take on changing the kernel that will
> break an older distro. Obviously, this change is too early to apply. But
> because an old distro has one app that will break if we make a change in
> the kernel, is that enough to keep that change out?

I suspect that powertop is enough of a developer thing that if that's
the only thing that breaks, we don't have to worry too much.

I don't want to break *everybody*, so new distro's should be
up-to-date. But breaking something like a F14-15 timeframe distro or
something staid like a SLES (or "Debian Stale" or whatever they call
that thing that only takes crazy-old binaries)? It's fine. We don't
want to *rush* into it, but no, if those distros are basically not
updating, we can't care about them forever for something like
powertop.

Things that break *normal* applications are different. There the rule
really must be "never".

                   Linus


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds