LWN.net Logo

A scientific basis for Open Source Software

A scientific basis for Open Source Software

Posted May 18, 2012 21:41 UTC (Fri) by theophrastus (guest, #80847)
Parent article: A scientific basis for Open Source Software

More power to them!

I've felt this needed to be the policy standard at public (tax payer funded) universities since a biochem group I was a member of was granted a "free" license for some of Schrodinger's molecular tool-sets (associated with their Glideā„¢ molecular binding libraries). I asked at various meetings "how can our results be published if we aren't allowed to know the mathematics behind their essential 'scoring function'"? I was waved-off with "it's enough that we publish that we used a particular version of their software" -- which was a proprietary blackbox. Our publications thus became free advertising - as was always their plan.

I was then afterwards deemed a trouble-maker as the university continued its slide toward "corporate cooperativity". "I suppose you'll be wanting next that we convert away from MSWord documents?", I was asked. "well yes... but let's work on the smaller infections first" [wink]


(Log in to post comments)

A scientific basis for Open Source Software

Posted May 20, 2012 20:10 UTC (Sun) by engla (guest, #47454) [Link]

Ask them if Word is integral to your research. I don't think it is, like the scoring function is.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds