| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editorBluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editorPosted Sep 18, 2003 2:21 UTC (Thu) by drfickle (guest, #1093)Parent article: The Screem HTML/XML Editor Unless you have a uber-s3|<r37 release that no one else has, Bluefish has always been a regular HTML text editor.
(Log in to post comments)
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editor Posted Sep 18, 2003 8:54 UTC (Thu) by hingo (guest, #14792) [Link] Calling Screem WYSIWYG doesn't really seem appropriate either...http://www.screem.org/screenshots.php While I'm at it, a WYSIWYG HTML-editor is one of the things I truly miss on Linux. (Last time I checked Mozilla composer was 'WYSIWYG' but certainly not 'HTML' ... ) I've even resorted to using wine+frontpage express once! I'm hearing that Quanta has something in the works, let's keep our fingers crossed. henrik
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editor Posted Sep 18, 2003 21:50 UTC (Thu) by nowster (subscriber, #67) [Link] Amaya is WYSIWIG, and is Open Source.
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editor Posted Sep 22, 2003 22:48 UTC (Mon) by crouchet (guest, #1084) [Link] >>Amaya is WYSIWIG, and is Open Source.<<And with its connection to W3C the code tends to be standard compliant and relatively simple (unlike the mess that comes from a horror like Frontpage). I have been know to crank something out in Amaya in then drag it over to Bluefish for polishing. I know some people are really bothered by the idea of using 2 tools instead of having it all in one but I don't see the problem. I just use each tool for what it does best. I know I CAN do non-WYSIWYG in Amaya but I prefer Bluefish for that part. The only MS tool for which I have found no real replacement is Visio, specifically some of the magic I can do with the pencil tool. I keep hoping something like Dia will get there. JC
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editor Posted Oct 8, 2003 17:41 UTC (Wed) by hingo (guest, #14792) [Link] You are both right.Amaya is a pretty good (and even free) wysiwyg html editor. The reason I forgot/discounted it is that it doesn't do my own homepage perfectly (ok, so I use two nested tables for layout, shoot me) so I've had no use for it and have counted is somewhat as a disappointment. I could see myself using Amaya for a from-scratch project just the same way the other writer suggests, throwing out a layout, then hand-code the rest of it somewhere else. This is how I've always done web-pages anyway, first do a quick mock-up in Frontpage/FP express/whatever, then finish the work by hand.
Bluefish isn't a WYSIWYG editor Posted Sep 18, 2003 15:50 UTC (Thu) by cook (subscriber, #4) [Link] Oops, you're right,<a href="http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/">Bluefish</a> isn't WSYWIG, the article has been updated.
|
|
||||||||||||