| |||||||||||||
RawhideRawhidePosted May 17, 2012 13:37 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: Time for rolling release focus? by rahulsundaram Parent article: Stable distributions and unstable software Yes and no... In truth, Rawhide often runs behind the frozen release for the latest updates; many Fedora developers have made it clear that Rawhide is a relatively low priority. Rawhide can be a good option—I run it—but sometimes I think that Fedora has bitten off a bit more than it can chew by trying to develop Rawhide and the next release simultaneously.
(Log in to post comments)
Rawhide Posted May 17, 2012 14:42 UTC (Thu) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
I don't think anyone would really describe the state of rawhide post-freeze as "development" - it ends up as a staging ground for things that can't be landed in the branched release, but there's certainly no expectation that it's a coherent release during that time. Whether there *should* be is a great question, and I'd agree that it's probably not very clear to an external observer what the expected behaviour of rawhide is at any given point in time.
|
|||||||||||||