| |||||||||||||
Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica)Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica)Posted May 14, 2012 10:27 UTC (Mon) by nye (guest, #51576)In reply to: Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica) by ajross Parent article: Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom (ars technica)
>You seem to be upset that the question was "unfair". Of course it was: facts aren't fair, they're just facts. No one sane would have found otherwise. But the Jury still had to issue a finding.
I think you have me confused for somebody else. I'm not upset at all; I'm just trying to understand the point of this - I wasn't previously aware that facts which are not in dispute still had to be decided by a jury (in this country we wouldn't even have a jury in this case).
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||