| |||||||||||||
My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica)My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica)Posted May 13, 2012 10:03 UTC (Sun) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402)In reply to: My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica) by wahern Parent article: My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica)
"That's a big "if", though. There're lots of conflicting economic interests at play."
That "if" becomes even bigger in the context of highly trusted certificate authorities issuing man-in-the-middle capable certificates to governments and "security systems" vendors.
Why do you think we would necessarily _know_ whether this organization is doing a good job maintaining security?
(Log in to post comments)
My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica) Posted May 13, 2012 20:02 UTC (Sun) by copsewood (subscriber, #199) [Link]
.secure wouldn't be worth anything other than as a temporary marketing ploy for taking cash off the gullible unless it uses DNSSEC throughout.
My own private Internet: .secure TLD floated as bad-guy-free zone (Ars Technica) Posted May 14, 2012 18:54 UTC (Mon) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]
s/unless/even if/
|
|||||||||||||