Advertisement
MultiTail: tail for professionals!
MultiTail allows you to monitor logfiles and command output in multiple windows in a terminal, colorize, filter & merge.
Weekly Edition
Return to the Development page
| |||||||||||||
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 releasedThe first release of Apache OpenOffice, 3.4, has been announced. The version numbering picks up from the last OpenOffice.org major release, which was 3.3. New features include improved ODF support, better pivot table support in Calc, native support for SVG, enhanced graphics, and more. "'With the donation of OpenOffice.org to the ASF, the Foundation, and especially the podling project, was given a daunting task: re-energize a community and transform OpenOffice from a codebase of unknown Intellectual Property heritage, to a vetted and Apache Licensed software suite,' said Jim Jagielski, ASF President and an Apache OpenOffice project mentor. 'The release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 shows just how successful the project has been: pulling in developers from over 21 corporate affiliations, while avoiding undue influence which is the death-knell of true open source communities; building a solid and stable codebase, with significant improvement and enhancements over other variants; and, of course, creating a healthy, vibrant and diverse user and developer community.'" (Log in to post comments)
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 14:14 UTC (Tue) by ingwa (subscriber, #71149) [Link]
So now they are three again: LibreOffice, Apache OpenOffice and Calligra...
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 14:22 UTC (Tue) by ledow (guest, #11753) [Link]
Not really. Libre has a huge headstart in terms of features and bug-fixing and creating maintainable code, and can pull in anything that Apache changes almost as soon as they change it. It also has many more developers and much more work done on it all the time.
It'll be a while before Apache's office catches up, and then it has to thrive and exceed the others. Which I don't really see happen.
You only have to load the two up side-by-side to see which one is actually a more "complete" and usable office suite, and just look at the code to see which has cleaner code. In one of the LibreOffice releases they deleted / translated some thousands of German comments and hundreds of unused functions, for instance. That suggests they had a much better understanding of the code and what it does and what is used before Apache OO even existed.
I think Libre has "won" and will probably continue to "win" for a while yet. Until then, the others are just free sources of patches.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 15:01 UTC (Tue) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
This is a case where choice is not a great thing to have, as there's no real diversity: both are "twin" code bases. I would prefer AOO developers helping start up a new code-base from scratch or helping Calligra instead.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 15:31 UTC (Tue) by landley (guest, #6789) [Link]
A computer history book I read (possibly "A Few Good Men From Univac") had an anecdote about "one point to the wedge" being necessary to make forward progress. And when even prominent non-programmers like Neil Gaiman are taking sides:
http://mobile.twitter.com/neilhimself/status/198880813520...
It's pretty obvious where that point is.
(The great thing about distributed source control is you can marshall patches in large groups with less merge friction, which means sucking everything of interest out of a branch is much less time consuming. But you still need everybody to agree on where "upstream" lives and what they're resyncing with. Apache OpenOffice really has no point, it exists because Oracle had an attack of ego and Apache inexplicably went along with it.)
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 15:53 UTC (Tue) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582) [Link] I think Libre has "won" and will probably continue to "win" for a while yet. Until then, the others are just free sources of patches. Calligra forked from KOffice, not OpenOffice. It has little or no common code with OpenOffice/LibreOffice, I believe.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 16:06 UTC (Tue) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link] No code, but it's a (somewhat) viable office suite. There just aren't many of those.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 17:26 UTC (Tue) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
Correct. It would be just great if Calligra could spawn the webkit of Office suites (OfficeKit?). With Harmattan Office in the Nokia N9, it looked like this was just about to happen, but Nokia is difficult to predict these days.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 9, 2012 14:56 UTC (Wed) by Los__D (guest, #15263) [Link]
My prediction: Nokia will become less and less of a handset maker, and more and more of a patent troll*. Sometime within the next few years, someone will buy the leftovers for the patents and/or to make them go away.
* Yeah, I know that it is not _real_ patent trolling as long as they make products themselves, but I guess you know what I mean.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 9, 2012 1:49 UTC (Wed) by leif81 (guest, #75132) [Link]
This battle likely won't be won on technical bullet points, but in marketing. And in that regard my money is on AOO.
It's got the name "Apache"
*shrug*
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 10, 2012 23:26 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
Likely not. When one can throw away something because the cost of getting it was near zero, then marketing is not all that important. Features are.
And, btw, why do you feel this way about a word? Isn't Office english enough for you? Are you afraid of becoming less masculine or something?
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 10, 2012 23:28 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
And I know of at least 4 languages that can claim that "Libre" is a valid word in the dictionary, starting with spanish.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 14, 2012 12:44 UTC (Mon) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link] While I have no semantic or cultural objection to the name, I do have an aesthetic one: /ə.ɒ/ (i.e. mid-central vowel followed by a short open back rounded vowel, with a syllable boundary between them), as found in the middle of "LibreOffice", seems phonologically misbegotten to this particular Anglophone's ear. (From the software standpoint, I'm in favour of LO rather than AOO.)
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 14, 2012 13:41 UTC (Mon) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
The World is big and chock-full of people that do not speak English. Be a bit more open, it will make you Libre.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 14, 2012 14:32 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
The first time I've seen libreoffice in my system during "apt-get upgrade" I was confused. After all, what "lib-reoffice" does?
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 19:26 UTC (Tue) by pbournho (guest, #1822) [Link]
Congratulations!
As a faithful Openoffice user, I tried briefly libreoffice, but I will switch back to Apache OpenOffice right now, as I have a long term confidence in software based on well known and organized consortia.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 20:56 UTC (Tue) by lkundrak (subscriber, #43452) [Link]
What makes you believe they have enough manpower to keep things going?
I'm not very confident. They did not even bother branding the product package properly (README refers to "OpenOffice.org", so does the window title and even a button in the help menu that pops up an "Apache OpenOffice" about box) and their web site now looks hacked together by someone not particularly literate in the area and ridiculously inconsistent:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/
Also, I thought OS/2 was done by a well known and organized consortia too...
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 21:36 UTC (Tue) by thumperward (guest, #34368) [Link]
> What makes you believe they have enough manpower to keep things going?
If the pbournho responsible for the parent post is the same pbournho as on Twitter, [1] I dare say that his faith may have something to do with working for one of the key providers of said manpower.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 9, 2012 13:38 UTC (Wed) by simosx (subscriber, #24338) [Link]
Oh, snap!
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 8, 2012 22:42 UTC (Tue) by jubal (subscriber, #67202) [Link] Please try to sound more naturally and less scripted when congratulating next time (if possible); astroturfing is terribly counterproductive.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 10, 2012 0:28 UTC (Thu) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402) [Link]
"as I have a long term confidence in software based on well known and organized consortia."
Indeed! I'm installing MeeGo as we speak...
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 10, 2012 4:07 UTC (Thu) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link]
It's hard to tell if the posting is meant ironically. More usually Apache is where projects go to die.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 10, 2012 22:54 UTC (Thu) by slashdot (guest, #22014) [Link]
That was quite funny.
Apache OpenOffice 3.4 released Posted May 9, 2012 0:31 UTC (Wed) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]
Congratulations to the AOO crew!
|
|||||||||||||