| |||||||||||||
Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica)Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica)Posted May 7, 2012 21:48 UTC (Mon) by mikov (subscriber, #33179)In reply to: Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica) by dskoll Parent article: Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom (ars technica)
Fortunately being a lawyer is not a prerequisite for being able to form an informed opinion :-)
(Log in to post comments)
Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom(ars technica) Posted May 8, 2012 19:35 UTC (Tue) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link]
In some cases it is. To form an informed opinion on this, one needs to know if Federal law, the 9th Circuit or the specific district rules asks for or requires a judge to put forth such questions. Without knowing that your original question is not informed opinion but what we would want the world to be like.
|
|||||||||||||