| |||||||||||||
Toward a safer fput()Toward a safer fput()Posted Apr 27, 2012 8:09 UTC (Fri) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935)In reply to: Toward a safer fput() by valyala Parent article: Toward a safer fput()
It does, except that it doesn't wreak havoc on synchronization primitives (APCs can be queued on processes that are waiting on a semaphore or event; if that happens, and a concurrent wakeup happens, something else will be woken up with potential for starvation or even deadlocks). Search for PulseEvent on MSDN or Raymond Chen's blog.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||