| |||||||||||||
systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many initssystemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many initsPosted Apr 25, 2012 7:58 UTC (Wed) by mezcalero (subscriber, #45103)In reply to: systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits by apoelstra Parent article: Shuttleworth: Quality has a new name
I didn't write NetworkManager.
Lennart
(Log in to post comments)
systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits Posted Apr 25, 2012 8:35 UTC (Wed) by apoelstra (subscriber, #75205) [Link]
My mistake. I (mis)read somewhere that you had.
systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits Posted Apr 26, 2012 21:36 UTC (Thu) by mgedmin (subscriber, #34497) [Link]
It's an easy mistake:
1. People like to flame about anything Lennart has written. 2. People like to flame about NetworkManager. 3. Therefore Lennart wrote NetworkManager.
systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits Posted May 3, 2012 0:52 UTC (Thu) by josh (subscriber, #17465) [Link]
For much the same reasons, really. NetworkManager, systemd, and pulseaudio all follow a similar policy of "no hacking around broken kernel code, fix the kernel". In all three cases, that policy results in occasional short-term breakage and "doesn't work for me", and long-term awesomeness.
|
|||||||||||||