| |||||||||||||
How about running untrusted applications?How about running untrusted applications?Posted Apr 24, 2012 16:11 UTC (Tue) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: How about running untrusted applications? by renox Parent article: LFCS 2012: X and Wayland
Correct me if I'm wrong but:
1. Aren't X11 applications able to specify their window title? 2. Aren't X11 applications able to override the WM redirection if they ask to? And finally... 3. Aren't server side decorations something exclusive of X? meaning that applications relying on this would not be portable to Windows or OSX?
(Log in to post comments)
How about running untrusted applications? Posted Apr 24, 2012 16:32 UTC (Tue) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
> Correct me if I'm wrong but:
> 1. Aren't X11 applications able to specify their window title?
Of course they are, but this doesn't mean that a window manager cannot get its own way to check whether the application is trusted or not (not so simple in practive but doable I think) and display a trust indicator next to the window tittle.
Not sure what you mean about your point 2, but clearly untrusted applications must be restricted in what they're allowed to do (no real fullscreen, no input redirection, etc).
> 3. Aren't server side decorations something exclusive of X? meaning that applications relying on this would not be portable to Windows or OSX?
Portable applications exist already today with X and Windows/OS X, so I'm not sure what is your point.
|
|||||||||||||