Personally, I tend not to take advice from people who abuse others as being stupid and yet can't write a coherent post. How do you program if you can't get simple things like spelling and capitalization right in English? (The first is why they invented spellcheckers; you just have to learn the rules for the second, but they're not that complex.)
Posted Apr 17, 2012 4:52 UTC (Tue) by brianomahoney (subscriber, #6206)
[Link]
English, UK US, De, Fr, It, Es, BPT
Oh well, I am so stupid! And you are a Lefty, first all to resort the 'ad homs'.
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 5:54 UTC (Tue) by edomaur (subscriber, #14520)
[Link]
I don't see the link between your answer and his question... Well, color me stupid.
More seriously, if I could erase PHP from my life, I would do. It's a mess as a language, and this has no link whatsover with my political preferences, my skin tone, the things I know as a learned human, and any other non-software related themas.
However, you have the right (and the left) to choose your programming language of preference, and to beeing offended by the negative views some other people will have about it.
But you have to be realist.
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 16:14 UTC (Tue) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)
[Link]
Seriously Brian, attacking everything as 'lefty' when totally irrelevant to this degree is a warning sign of schizophrenia. Please talk to a mental health professional.
Not Again
Posted Apr 19, 2012 14:27 UTC (Thu) by jschrod (subscriber, #1646)
[Link]
Thanks for giving the information that you can be ignored for all times on LWN.net.
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 10:49 UTC (Tue) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
[Link]
How do you program if you can't get simple things like spelling and capitalization right in English?
First, English spelling is sufficiently non-simple that a spellchecker can't save you from howlers.
Second, a former (English!) co-worker of mine could design and write sane, coherent software despite being unable to reliably internalize the spelling of "receive".
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 14:34 UTC (Tue) by pboddie (subscriber, #50784)
[Link]
If the compiler keeps telling you that you're wrong, eventually you'll step up and give it something it can work with, and then you'll always have the executable and a debugger. There isn't such a toolchain for English.
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 16:18 UTC (Tue) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129)
[Link]
I guess it depends on what you consider sane.
> Besides a mathematical inclination, an exceptionally good mastery of one's native tongue is the most vital asset of a competent programmer.
(Edsger Dijkstra)
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 16:38 UTC (Tue) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)
[Link]
Yeah. Even Ritchie couldn't spell "create" right.
/me ducks
Not Again
Posted Apr 17, 2012 22:34 UTC (Tue) by tjc (subscriber, #137)
[Link]
I think that was Thompson, and I *think* he said that if he could change one thing about Unix, that would be it.
Not Again
Posted Apr 18, 2012 12:50 UTC (Wed) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)
[Link]
I recall it was Ritchie, but I could be wrong. And yes, that's the quote I was thinking of.
Not Again
Posted Apr 19, 2012 11:00 UTC (Thu) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262)
[Link]
Posted May 12, 2012 1:54 UTC (Sat) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054)
[Link]
Back in the day, I was programming a custom multiplexer board for the HP 2100. Obviously I had to have a testbed that would cause it to transfer data in either direction. :-)
Being lazy, most of its commands were single letters: `s' for send, `h' for halt, &c. But to get it to listen for incoming, I had to type in the entire word `receive' correctly. By the end of the week I had no further trouble remembering the spelling.