| |||||||||||||
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack projectThey should be paying attention to the lumberjack projectPosted Apr 16, 2012 16:48 UTC (Mon) by jhoblitt (subscriber, #77733)In reply to: They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project by dlang Parent article: Toward more reliable logging
The use of JSON (and/or YAML and/or a serialization format that handles nested data types) is absolutely the right approach as "soon or later" someone will want to log data that doesn't fit well into $whatever_new_format_we_just_came_up_with.
Why wasn't the author of logstash included in the lumberjack discussions?
(Log in to post comments)
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project Posted Apr 16, 2012 18:20 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
> Why wasn't the author of logstash included in the lumberjack discussions?
I don't know. I found out about the Lumberjack discussions via announcments (I don't remember exactly where, I think I remember seeing an announcement here on lwn), it's an open list lumberjack-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org
RedHat had some sort of meeting back in Febuary where they had several of the syslog developers there, and the lumberjack project was annouced right about the beginning of March.
the volume on the mailing list varies greatly, we had several days of 40-50 messages/day and then there have been no messages for over a week now.
|
|||||||||||||