They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project

They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project

Posted Apr 15, 2012 3:02 UTC (Sun) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)
In reply to: They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project by aliguori
Parent article: Toward more reliable logging

According to the JSON specification, the following is a perfectly valid number:

18446744073709551615 (AKA 2⁶⁴-1)

It may be that some (most?) JSON libraries can't handle such a large number correctly, but it's valid according to the JSON grammar.

---

(Log in to post comments)