They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
Posted Apr 15, 2012 3:02 UTC (Sun) by dskoll
In reply to: They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
Parent article: Toward more reliable logging
According to the JSON specification, the following is a perfectly valid number:
18446744073709551615 (AKA 264-1)
It may be that some (most?) JSON libraries can't handle such a large number correctly, but it's valid according to the JSON grammar.
to post comments)