LWN.net Logo

LFCS 2012: Trademarks for free software projects

LFCS 2012: Trademarks for free software projects

Posted Apr 13, 2012 12:30 UTC (Fri) by cortana (subscriber, #24596)
In reply to: LFCS 2012: Trademarks for free software projects by nix
Parent article: LFCS 2012: Trademarks for free software projects

Out of interest, was the letter from Google's lawyers, or from the publisher of the column, or someone else?


(Log in to post comments)

LFCS 2012: Trademarks for free software projects

Posted Apr 13, 2012 14:12 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

That was hypothetical: I'm thankfully not in a position to get stuff published publically enough to have trademark lawyers bash me, though New Scientist has noted being bashed by Google's lawyers to such a degree that they now call it 'a famous web search engine' rather than use its name anywhere in the magazine -- and that was regarding references to using Google itself, so a plain permitted nominative use, and even then the lawyers wouldn't go away. The case I know most about involves Portakabin and Private Eye. (Being Private Eye, their response was side-splittingly hilarious, at least to sad cases like me. A summary is here: <http://adammacqueen.blogspot.co.uk/2007/09/portakabin.html>.)

Portakabin

Posted Apr 13, 2012 15:01 UTC (Fri) by cortana (subscriber, #24596) [Link]

Thanks for that, sorry for the confusion.

Portakabin

Posted Apr 13, 2012 20:28 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

No, no, my fault for confusingly posing a hypothetical without saying as much. (A liepo, one might call it.)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds