| |||||||||||||
NX for Wayland?NX for Wayland?Posted Apr 9, 2012 19:26 UTC (Mon) by geofft (subscriber, #59789)In reply to: NX for Wayland? by littlesandra88 Parent article: The state of Wayland You can get a lot of what NX does today with xpra.
(Log in to post comments)
NX for Wayland? Posted Apr 9, 2012 20:57 UTC (Mon) by littlesandra88 (guest, #64017) [Link]
That sure looks promising!
How is performance compared to FreeNX/NeatX?
try xpra Posted Apr 10, 2012 15:32 UTC (Tue) by amtota (guest, #4012) [Link]
Try the x264 support currently in trunk (no releases yet), according to the preliminary figures we have it is an order of magnitude more efficient than anything (open-source) out there.
It is lossy but more than good enough to use a terminal over it, and if you really must have a pixel perfect image then use png encoding.
try xpra Posted Apr 11, 2012 19:42 UTC (Wed) by littlesandra88 (guest, #64017) [Link]
That's very impressive!
How will Wayland affect xpre, when Fedora and Ubuntu adopts Wayland?
try xpra Posted Oct 10, 2012 8:20 UTC (Wed) by amtota (guest, #4012) [Link]
First, it looks like Wayland adoption is not going as fast as originally thought.
Second, although there are talks of remoting support in Wayland, it does not look like this is going to have anywhere near feature parity with xpra: no video/lossy compression, not support for re-connection, etc...
NX for Wayland? Posted Apr 12, 2012 22:36 UTC (Thu) by przemoc (subscriber, #67594) [Link]
Thank you for mentioning xpra! I wasn't aware of this "screen for X" tool till today. Works fine.
NX for Wayland? Posted Apr 12, 2012 22:44 UTC (Thu) by przemoc (subscriber, #67594) [Link]
By the used semantics, I should call it "tmux for X" after all...
|
|||||||||||||