| |||||||||||||
AT&T Microcell FAIL (FailOverflow)AT&T Microcell FAIL (FailOverflow)Posted Apr 9, 2012 14:58 UTC (Mon) by Los__D (guest, #15263)In reply to: AT&T Microcell FAIL (FailOverflow) by oldtomas Parent article: AT&T Microcell FAIL (FailOverflow)
Oh, I agree. I just don't see what any of this have to do with NAT hole punching.
(Log in to post comments)
NAT hole Posted Apr 22, 2012 9:31 UTC (Sun) by oldtomas (guest, #72579) [Link]
Sorry, I wasn't aware that there's a canonical use of the term "NAT hole punching" [1]. Now I know.
I was using it rather loosely, as in "enticing the user's browser to coax the firewall device to open a window".
|
|||||||||||||