| |||||||||||||
Prior art for 104 and 520? (An update on Oracle v. Google)Prior art for 104 and 520? (An update on Oracle v. Google)Posted Apr 5, 2012 7:49 UTC (Thu) by fredrik (subscriber, #232)Parent article: An update on Oracle v. Google
Is there really no prior art on the two remaining patents? 104 was originally filed in 1992, 520 in 1998. It sounds incredible that no-one would have publicly discussed anything like this before that time.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||