| |||||||||||||
The 3.4 merge window is closedThe 3.4 merge window is closedPosted Apr 3, 2012 13:32 UTC (Tue) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)In reply to: The 3.4 merge window is closed by HelloWorld Parent article: The 3.4 merge window is closed
What will be the MultiArch tuple for x32 binaries, btw? And what will we use for ./configure --host=? In the SPARC land, "sparcv9" seems to have become the tag to use when referring to ELF32 binaries able to use 64-bit instructions.
(Log in to post comments)
The 3.4 merge window is closed Posted Apr 3, 2012 16:51 UTC (Tue) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
it would seem to me that 'x32' in place of 'amd64' or 'i386' would be the obviously right answer (they may do something else, but why?)
The 3.4 merge window is closed Posted Apr 3, 2012 17:02 UTC (Tue) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]
Just wanted to be sure. After all, they already chose amd64 instead of x86_64 :-) [Then again, amd64 would be a lot more creditgiving would it appear in uname -m]
The 3.4 merge window is closed Posted Apr 3, 2012 17:10 UTC (Tue) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
remember that at the time they named it amd64, Intel was very opposed to it, only AMD was shipping it, and there wasn't a x86 architecture, instead there were i[3456]86 architectures
|
|||||||||||||