| |||||||||||||
The article is correctThe article is correctPosted Mar 31, 2012 7:21 UTC (Sat) by Pawlerson (guest, #74136)In reply to: The article is correct by scientes Parent article: Free is too expensive (Economist)
Yep, this article is 100% bullshit.There's even evidence the Economist is anti Linux site: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/11/operating_systemsAnother Linux rant in the same spirit, but this time it's even worse. What s funny you can replace Linux with any other OS name and article will remain "valid", because it's nothing more than generalizations and subjective opinions. It reminds me MS FUD. I'm quite angry this appeared at lwn, but on the other side I would have missed a possibility to make some clarifications. ;)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||