| |||||||||||||
Distributions looking at LLVMDistributions looking at LLVMPosted Mar 30, 2012 12:17 UTC (Fri) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262)In reply to: Distributions looking at LLVM by gowen Parent article: Distributions looking at LLVM
(I assume you mean variadic templates, not macros.)
Some time ago Fedora shipped a version of clang (2.8 IIRC) that was completely incompatible with the system GCC headers, which was silly - they should have shipped an older libstdc++ (alongside the system one) just for use by clang. Clang 3.0 and later has far fewer issues and work well with all but the very bleeding-edgiest libstdc++ headers.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||