Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2Posted Mar 30, 2012 5:58 UTC (Fri) by debacle (subscriber, #7114)In reply to: OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2 by cortana Parent article: GNOME 3.4 released
No, it does not. At least in 3.0 and 3.2. The high contrast would be too much for me, anyway.
(Btw. In the default theme, the look-and-feel of GNOME 3 seems to be less uniform/consistent than GNOME 2. Some windows/dialogs look completely different than most. But maybe these things are fixed in 3.4, which I will try as soon as it is in Debian.)
(Log in to post comments)
OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2 Posted Mar 30, 2012 7:17 UTC (Fri) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link]
File an accessibility bug please.
OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2 Posted Mar 30, 2012 13:41 UTC (Fri) by debacle (subscriber, #7114) [Link]
A bug (#603867) has been opened on 2009-12-05 and closed without code change on 2010-10-16. It is not marked as a11y related, however.
OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2 Posted Mar 31, 2012 13:32 UTC (Sat) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link]
Just file a new one and cc me please (bugzilla-gnome@vitters.nl). Explain that you need it for accessibility reasons.
They don't want to limit the options, but if you explain the reasoning (need it for a11y), then it can be properly addressed.
E.g., option in a11y dialog maybe to do slight contract change (or background). Not the full back/white stuff.
OT: Accessibility problem with GNOME 3.2 Posted Apr 3, 2012 9:54 UTC (Tue) by debacle (subscriber, #7114) [Link]
Bug 673417 has been added to the database.
Thanks in advance!
|
|||||||||||||