| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
AuthenticityAuthenticityPosted Sep 12, 2003 15:28 UTC (Fri) by proski (subscriber, #104)In reply to: Authenticity by dwalters Parent article: Linus responds to SCO My doubts have nothing to do with contents of the Linus' letter. It's the wording of the LWN article that made me (and probably others) suspicious: An "open response" from Linus Torvalds to Darl McBride's letter is being circulatedIf the editors said - "we've got a responce from Linus" or "Linus has published his responce", there would be no question. But it sounded as if the editor wasn't sure if the letter was original.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||