| |||||||||||||
Distributions looking at LLVMDistributions looking at LLVMPosted Mar 24, 2012 21:45 UTC (Sat) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616)In reply to: Distributions looking at LLVM by rahulsundaram Parent article: Distributions looking at LLVM
err, i'm not interested in sparse ;).
(Log in to post comments)
Distributions looking at LLVM Posted Mar 25, 2012 1:09 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
You were wondering what he was doing in your first comment in this thread. So I assumed you were interested in the answer.
Distributions looking at LLVM Posted Mar 25, 2012 15:12 UTC (Sun) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link]
does rhetorical question mean anything to you? :P obviously if clang/llvm work fine (for me) then the problems must be somewhere else. now that it turned out to be the sparse/llvm interface, i consider the matter settled.
|
|||||||||||||