| |||||||||||||
Still no strlcpy and friendsStill no strlcpy and friendsPosted Mar 24, 2012 16:23 UTC (Sat) by tjc (subscriber, #137)In reply to: Still no strlcpy and friends by PaXTeam Parent article: GNU libc 2.15 released
I've always found snprintf to be a reasonable alternative to strlcpy, and I remain unmoved by your contempt for programmers who use it! :)
Perhaps an a well-reasoned explanation as to why you think its bad would persuade me otherwise...
(Log in to post comments)
Still no strlcpy and friends Posted Mar 24, 2012 18:16 UTC (Sat) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link]
if strlcpy is the best fit for a particular problem then you don't 'emulate' it, you use it. and if it's not present in your system then you implement it.
|
|||||||||||||