| |||||||||||||
SMP?SMP?Posted Mar 24, 2012 12:21 UTC (Sat) by ScottMinster (subscriber, #67541)In reply to: SMP? by zlynx Parent article: Toward better NUMA scheduling
You're right. I just verified with a simple CPU heavy application that it does tend to stay on a single core. I think I've noticed migration in the past with compilers, which tend to use more I/O.
(Log in to post comments)
SMP? Posted Apr 1, 2012 21:38 UTC (Sun) by Wol (guest, #4433) [Link]
This was a well-known failure mode with - I think - NT4.
If you were running a single heavy-CPU process the scheduler would make it jump from CPU to CPU as it tried to balance the load ... :-)
Cheers,
|
|||||||||||||