| |||||||||||||
Distributions looking at LLVMDistributions looking at LLVMPosted Mar 22, 2012 21:47 UTC (Thu) by NAR (subscriber, #1313)In reply to: Distributions looking at LLVM by jhhaller Parent article: Distributions looking at LLVM
What was the invalid value? 4.999999 instead of 5.0?
(Log in to post comments)
Distributions looking at LLVM Posted Mar 22, 2012 21:53 UTC (Thu) by jhhaller (subscriber, #56103) [Link]
No, it was one less than it should have been, like it waited to do the ++ part of d++ until after the loop iteration rather than before, or used the wrong register inside the loop. ++d worked fine.
Distributions looking at LLVM Posted Mar 23, 2012 14:48 UTC (Fri) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988) [Link]
Looks like a corner case triggered by code no one would ever write. Did you file a bug report? I would also point out that GCC has tons of bugs like this fixed in every minor release, so it's nothing special (yet).
|
|||||||||||||