| |||||||||||||
Kernel competition in the enterprise spaceKernel competition in the enterprise spacePosted Mar 20, 2012 21:40 UTC (Tue) by csamuel (✭ supporter ✭, #2624)Parent article: Kernel competition in the enterprise space
I would argue that, given the advice is to *not* use anything earlier than 3.2 for btrfs due a bug which can result in a corrupt filesystem on powerloss, describing Oracle characterising 3.0 as production ready for btrfs as optimistic is being rather charitable.
Especially as there is likely a disk format change necessary to fix the painfully low hard link limit in a directory which can break backuppc, gnus and (apparently) git.
(Log in to post comments)
Kernel competition in the enterprise space Posted Apr 9, 2012 12:22 UTC (Mon) by Lennie (subscriber, #49641) [Link]
Trust me, they probably backported all btrfs changes from 3.2 and 3.3 to 3.0.
|
|||||||||||||