Re: Clarifying facts

On 14 Mar 2012, at 02:36, Rob Weir wrote:
> 
> Let's see if anyone else thinks this is too verbose.  Remember, FAQ's
> are not intended to be read as an article, one after another.
> Typically they are things we we link to and point users to for
> specific questions.

Since you have essentially eliminated my contributions and replaced them with something different,
I'll withdraw from this activity until the partisan style you've chosen changes. A pity as we
genuinely had some collaboration sparking between unlike minds.

As an added bonus you'll not have to worry about any edit locks :-)

S.