Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 23, 2013
An "enum" for Python 3
An unexpected perf feature
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
and is Greg's work going to LF now or unknown?
Statistics for the 3.3 development cycle
Posted Mar 8, 2012 8:47 UTC (Thu) by arnd (subscriber, #8866)
Same thing for Kumar: while he is now at TI, all his patches that made it into 3.3 are still for Freescale.
Unfortunately, Linaro does not show up in the list, presumably because the assignees are mostly accounted to their employers. According to my count, there are 218 non-merge changesets from Linaro in 3.3, which would put us in front of Samsung (counting everyone who posts from @linaro.org, plus myself from arndb.de, and I'm probably missing a few more). I'm sure it would mean a lot to our beancounters if that could be fixed in the next statistics.
I would personally like to see merge changesets included in the stats as well, mostly because it I consider merging just as important as doing the patches to start with, but also because it would put me in the list. ;-)
Posted Mar 8, 2012 14:15 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1)
About merge commits - if we counted those, we'd have to let Linus back onto the list...:)
Posted Mar 8, 2012 14:58 UTC (Thu) by broonie (subscriber, #7078)
Posted Mar 9, 2012 21:24 UTC (Fri) by patrick_g (subscriber, #44470)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds