LWN.net Logo

iff you accept /* -> /usr/*, then why not instead /usr/* -> /*

iff you accept /* -> /usr/*, then why not instead /usr/* -> /*

Posted Mar 1, 2012 23:52 UTC (Thu) by filteredperception (guest, #5692)
In reply to: iff you accept /* -> /usr/*, then why not instead /usr/* -> /* by filteredperception
Parent article: Various notes on /usr unification

actually maybe I'm just being stupid. network mounted /usr. Probably I should follow one of these links and either read for the first time, or more likely discover something I never bothered to remember, as to what 'usr' means. (?SharedResource).


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds