| |||||||||||||
Hostility?Hostility?Posted Feb 22, 2012 14:25 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: Handset cohabitation: Ubuntu for Android by jospoortvliet Parent article: Handset cohabitation: Ubuntu for Android Interesting, Jos...where have you seen hostility? Hopefully not in my article; I just dedicated a feature slot to this on a moment's notice because I thought it was interesting. I did raise some concerns - this wasn't meant to be free advertising for Canonical - and I still think there is some validity to those concerns. But I wasn't hostile. Looking around, I've not seen a whole lot of others being hostile either. What unhappiness exists is mostly of the "I wish I could actually try this," which is a very different thing.
(Log in to post comments)
Hostility? Posted Feb 22, 2012 17:43 UTC (Wed) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164) [Link]
Karim seems rather unhappy with the idea of per-unit royalties, at least... And Canonical has taken quite a beating over a number of other things. Indeed, on LWN the tone is usual civil (unlike on many other forums or compared to what you hear from people in person) but it still feels to me that people often bang harder on those who try but aren't 'perfect enough' than on those not even bothering... Did android not get a severe verbal beating?
And no, it's surely not LWN.net which is unfriendly - your reporting is usually very balanced.
... maybe I just read more negativity in Karmi's comment than there was :D
Hostility? Posted Feb 22, 2012 18:48 UTC (Wed) by karim (subscriber, #114) [Link]
FWIW:
1) I'm not LWN (nor represent them in any way). 2) there's no reason we all have to agree.
I'm surprised by the per-unit royalties and my first gut reaction is to say that they won't get any grass-roots support because of that.
I think it's a very cool technical hack for sure.
However, I still don't see where the demand is coming for this. Maybe as a white-label desktop for handset manufacturers. But, unless I'm missing somethning, the "Ubuntu" branding has ZERO value in the mainstream market. If it were "windows" or "macos" it would've been an entirely different story.
Hostility? Posted Feb 23, 2012 2:08 UTC (Thu) by jmalcolm (guest, #8876) [Link]
I doubt that there is a demand for "Ubuntu". Clearly though, Canonical thinks there might be some excitement about the ability to have a "portable desktop" embedded in their phone.
Why not beat the Windows and Mac teams to satisfying that demand if you think it is there?
At the very least, they might raise their profile and history as a credible supplier to the kinds of companies that might enable Ubuntu TV or whatever consumer vision they pursue next.
Hostility? Posted Feb 23, 2012 2:48 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
well, since Android is running a linux kernel, it's a lot easier to add in a linux-based userspace like Ubuntu than it would be to add Windows or Mac userspaces.
now, nothing stops Apple from doing a similar thing with their idevices, or Microsoft doing something similar with their windows phone offering.
but Android has a much broader manufacturing base to do this sort of thing with.
So no, I don't think there is a demand for "Ubuntu", but I don't think it matters.
RedHat is no longer interested in the desktop (at least on a commercial basis) and there really aren't that many companies competing with Canonical for this sort of thing, so who else is going to put the effort in to this sort of OS market?
Hostility? Posted Feb 25, 2012 20:40 UTC (Sat) by jspaleta (subscriber, #50639) [Link]
Who else?
Google that's who else.
Any cloud heavy desktop experience is fully inside of Google's long term plan. ChromeOS is not the last best hope for Google. They will keep plugging away at cracking open the cloud heavy desktop concept and turning it into a real market. If an Ubuntu branded dock accessible desktop experience layered over an Android kernel ends up gaining traction, Google would be incredibly stupid not to followup with a competing technology as part of Android itself. And Google is not stupid.
If Canonical gets any traction with that it at all in the short term with any OEM shipping an Android phone, its just going to lead to Google rolling competing functionality into a future Android version. Given a choice between Canonical and Google to provide feature enhancements to Android phones... who is going to win OEM mindshare a year out from now?
And let's be honest about the timescales here. This is going to take a year+ to really see traction as a deliverable. Is any OEM going to stand by Canonical for the year+ to gain traction without also badgering Google and encourging them to field a competing offering? OEMs are pretty shrewd when it comes to cost control, they have to be to make any money selling devices.
And we haven't even seen developer models for hardware with this feature yet. Well other than last year's Motorola Atrix concept and its weird lapdock idea and man even I totally missed that thing when it was first announced. Oh yes that was Ubuntu powered OEM dockable desktop interface offering. And it went mostly unnoticed. The fact that we are here nearly a year later talking about what looks like the same underlying integration that we didn't find interesting last year says some remarkable things, about the market and probably about the contractual relationship between Motorola and Canonical concerning the Atrix. Are we ready for this concept this year? Or is this still more visionary than what the market is ready to actually put on retail shelves at a pricepoint people will pay for?
-jef
Hostility? Posted Feb 25, 2012 20:53 UTC (Sat) by karim (subscriber, #114) [Link]
ChromeOS side-by-side with Android? I can see that. Interesting idea. And yes, that might actually have some legs.
Hostility? Posted Feb 26, 2012 0:56 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
I think that Google is far more interested in the capability existing then in writing/controlling it themselves.
They started Chrome because Firefox wasn't doing a good job, the competition has caused Firefox to shape up significantly
they started Chrome OS because nobody else was working on an OS that would fit a similar niche, If Canonical does a good job with something like this, I don't see any reason for Google to try to crush it, I think it would be more likely that Google would instead try to support it. Google gets almost the same the benefit without having to do all the engineering, and more importantly, the support work.
Hostility? Posted Feb 28, 2012 21:05 UTC (Tue) by ceplm (guest, #41334) [Link]
No, Google started Chrome project to have a platform they can control and improve upon.
Hostility? Posted Feb 23, 2012 22:55 UTC (Thu) by daglwn (subscriber, #65432) [Link]
> Canonical thinks there might be some excitement about the ability to have
> a "portable desktop" embedded in their phone.
I have wanted this for a couple of years, simply for the portability factor. I love my netbook but it is something I need a bag to carry. A phone I can just put in my pocket and dock it when I need to.
Now, this doesn't help me when I want to work on the bus, but this plus a pico projector and roll-up keyboard just might. :)
|
|||||||||||||