| |||||||||||||
Because it's a memory-hogging monster?Because it's a memory-hogging monster?Posted Feb 9, 2012 14:23 UTC (Thu) by pdewacht (subscriber, #47633)In reply to: Because it's a memory-hogging monster? by viiru Parent article: Tracking users
I have the complete opposite experience: I find (recent versions of) Firefox much more economical with RAM than Chromium. I tried using Chromium for a while and it required about 50-150 megabyte per tab. With Firefox I often have two dozen or so tabs open, and Chromium can't handle that on my 2GB laptop without swapping.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||