| |||||||||||||
Betrayed by a bitfieldBetrayed by a bitfieldPosted Feb 6, 2012 18:40 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Betrayed by a bitfield by daglwn Parent article: Betrayed by a bitfield Not quite. s3.14's definition of 'memory location' is either an object of scalar type, or a maximal sequence of adjacent bit-fields all having nonzero widthTherefore, even a 'long long' variable occupies a single 'memory location' by that defintion. However, a two-byte array of two chars occupies two memory locations. A location is not the same as an address.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||