| |||||||||||||
SealedSealedPosted Feb 1, 2012 22:11 UTC (Wed) by jiu (subscriber, #57673)In reply to: Sealed by BrucePerens Parent article: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
And why does SFC not insist on publishing the terms of these settlements? It would make things more straightforward.
(Log in to post comments)
Sealed Posted Feb 2, 2012 1:31 UTC (Thu) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]
Because it's sealed. They're not allowed to. I would guess that it's Best Buy's request, but only the SFC knows for certain, and they probably can't say.
Sealed Posted Feb 2, 2012 5:16 UTC (Thu) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510) [Link] Bradley wrote today about what the terms are, in this blog posting. It is unfortunate that most defendants are more willing to settle if the terms are sealed. But you can look at the IRS filings which Bradley linked to from his blog posting, and find out what money there was, and where it went.
|
|||||||||||||