> It is NOT the goal of this to help people violate the GPL, but rather to decrease the risk of some nuclear outcome, should a mistake be made somewhere in the supply chain for a product. For example, it is possible for a mistake made by an ODM (like providing the wrong busybox source version) could result in the recall of millions of unrelated products.
As Bruce Perens pointed out earlier, SFC's settlement terms have always been very reasonable, so there's no "nuclear outcome" to be expected. Given the current state of affairs, the only conceivable purpose of your project is actually what you deny it to be: avoiding GPL enforcement. So I'm sorry, but I believe you're lying to us.
Besides, it's a really, really lame excuse anyway. It really isn't that hard to just read and follow the bloody license. If people fuck it up nevertheless, they deserve to be punished.