Rob Landley's (ex-busybox maintainer among other things and listed as a "potential contractor" for the non-GPL busybox replacement)) commented on the post with an interesting reply from the other side of the argument: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/10437.html?thread=301509#cmt3...
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Posted Jan 31, 2012 19:01 UTC (Tue) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
[Link]
Thanks for that link. I believe it should be mentioned in the main article.
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Posted Feb 1, 2012 0:09 UTC (Wed) by vegge (subscriber, #6926)
[Link]
> Thanks for that link. I believe it should be mentioned in the main article.
Yes, definitely. Landley's comment provides a good counterpoint.
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Posted Feb 1, 2012 10:59 UTC (Wed) by fb (subscriber, #53265)
[Link]
> Rob Landley's (ex-busybox maintainer among other things and listed as a "potential contractor" for the non-GPL busybox replacement)) commented on the post with an interesting reply from the other side of the argument: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/10437.html?thread=301509#cmt3...
Thanks for the link. Very informative. I also think it should be linked from the LWN news item.
[...]
On a side note, while this news item has become quite a flame party, as a heavy user of embedded Linux devices I still find it very interesting.