Posted Jan 31, 2012 16:08 UTC (Tue) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)
[Link]
nothing in a patent is required to be 'useful'
One thing I do remember from a class long ago is the three pillars of
patentability: the invention must be new, useful, and nonobvious. I
just googled that phrase to make sure I hadn't fabricated it in my mind
over the years, and I got a bunch of hits.
Software is The Glass Bead Game
Posted Feb 1, 2012 12:53 UTC (Wed) by java_developer (guest, #82469)
[Link]
dlang a patent does have to be useful, at least in the US which may not be where you are based.
Software is The Glass Bead Game
Posted Feb 1, 2012 19:22 UTC (Wed) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
in theory you are correct, but in theory it must also be novel and non-obvious.
in practice, the person applying for a patent doesn't even have to prove that the idea works (no working models required)