| |||||||||||||
Shared painShared painPosted Jan 29, 2012 2:02 UTC (Sun) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767)In reply to: Shared pain by zlynx Parent article: XFS: the filesystem of the future?
"I'd much rather have the performance."
Why? And have you actually measured the "performance" that you are sacrificing reliability for? I'd certainly want to quantify what I was getting in return for the reduced reliability. In testing I've done, I couldn't tell the difference between data=ordered and data=writeback with ext4. Or for that matter, between default and nodelalloc.
Even for a single user desktop, I just don't see that the trade-off is a win. YMMV, I suppose. But I would encourage you to run some objective tests.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||