LWN.net Logo

The case for the /usr merge

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 27, 2012 23:36 UTC (Fri) by slashdot (guest, #22014)
Parent article: The case for the /usr merge

Wow, finally!

This is one of the things that one immediately notices as being idiotic when he starts learning about Unix.


(Log in to post comments)

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 30, 2012 12:18 UTC (Mon) by Seegras (subscriber, #20463) [Link]

Idiotic?

You didn't think about NFS, read-only /usr and so on. Granted, nobody uses these anymore, BUT that is the reason the setup is like this.

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Feb 2, 2012 14:28 UTC (Thu) by rleigh (subscriber, #14622) [Link]

These /were/ reasons for the existence of /usr. But nowadays we can mount / read-only (including /usr), and we can also NFS mount / (including /usr), making the need for a separate /usr mount redundant.

Regards,
Roger

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds