| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The case for the /usr mergeThe case for the /usr mergePosted Jan 27, 2012 21:42 UTC (Fri) by AndreE (subscriber, #60148)In reply to: The case for the /usr merge by kju Parent article: The case for the /usr merge
Booting the ramdisk MIGHT be slower ( but I'd bet you'd have a hard time noticing). Running programs from the ramdisk would certainly be faster
So what arbitrary measure should we use to benchmark our system rescue? The main point remains that "performance of loading binaries" is hardly a prime concern for system rescue situations.
(Log in to post comments)
The case for the /usr merge Posted Jan 27, 2012 22:06 UTC (Fri) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
> Booting the ramdisk MIGHT be slower ( but I'd bet you'd have a hard time noticing). Running programs from the ramdisk would certainly be faster
as long as you have enough ram to both hold the ramdisk _and_ the working set for all your applications.
|
|
||||||||||||