| |||||||||||||
The case for the /usr mergeThe case for the /usr mergePosted Jan 27, 2012 3:51 UTC (Fri) by sjj (subscriber, #2020)In reply to: The case for the /usr merge by rickmoen Parent article: The case for the /usr merge
It was a simple factual correction. No need to get personal.
I just wish that people commenting on this site would try to be a little more thoughtful and not just assert "bullshit" based on their preconceived notions. Yes, I'm old fashioned and often disappointed.
(Log in to post comments)
The case for the /usr merge Posted Jan 27, 2012 6:32 UTC (Fri) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998) [Link]
No, "You didn't RTFA" is not a simple factual correction.
The case for the /usr merge Posted Jan 27, 2012 16:04 UTC (Fri) by faassen (guest, #1676) [Link]
True, saying "my understanding of the article is different" or something along those lines would have been more polite, though less succinct.
The case for the /usr merge Posted Jan 27, 2012 17:24 UTC (Fri) by sjj (subscriber, #2020) [Link]
Point taken. Argument by assertion just pushes my buttons.
|
|||||||||||||