| |||||||||||||
SFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devicesSFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devicesPosted Jan 14, 2012 22:43 UTC (Sat) by JanC_ (guest, #34940)In reply to: SFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devices by mjg59 Parent article: SFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devices
So, what if ARM bootloaders provided an option to bypass loading the available UEFI payload, would that comply with this requirement? :P
(Log in to post comments)
SFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devices Posted Jan 15, 2012 20:35 UTC (Sun) by Wol (guest, #4433) [Link]
As I understand it, UEFI calls the bootloader, so no, that's not technically possible ...
Cheers,
SFLC: Microsoft confirms UEFI fears, locks down ARM devices Posted Jan 16, 2012 19:53 UTC (Mon) by juliank (subscriber, #45896) [Link]
It is more likely that the chip's bootloader starts UEFI which then starts the system's bootloader.
Boot loader (chip) => UEFI => Bootloader (System) => Kernel
|
|||||||||||||