| |||||||||||||
Sad attitudeSad attitudePosted Dec 27, 2011 15:59 UTC (Tue) by steffen780 (guest, #68142)In reply to: Sad attitude by raven667 Parent article: Quotes of the week
Actually, that is only part of what he wrote. He also seems to have a big problem with choice of desktops. He says that he doesn't want to spare a single thought for the other desktops, using the term of "vertical integration" (which is fine, except that he describes "vertical exclusion") - and in the past he attempted to restrict Gnome to Linux. So in short, he wants to force everyone who wants to run free software to use Gnome on Linux. Surely after this posting it should be obvious why so many people have such a strong dislike of his personality. And he should be glad that people like Linus are more enlightened than he is because else his beloved Gnome3 wouldn't even run on Linux, given that Linus doesn't like Gnome3.
He should restrict himself to coding and leave decision-making and communication to people who can see beyond their own desk. All he's achieving with his rants is to offend and allienate people, further splintering the overall effort to produce free desktops and giving the Gnome community a bad name.
(Log in to post comments)
Sad attitude Posted Dec 29, 2011 17:18 UTC (Thu) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link] [FX: looks at the list of installable window managers, GUI widget libraries, and X display managers in Debian.] Frankly, I don't see how the effort to produce free desktops could get noticeably more splintered than it already is. (I'm also not entirely convinced that GNOME managing to alienate everyone else is of itself a bad thing.)
Sad attitude Posted Jan 5, 2012 9:31 UTC (Thu) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link]
I don't see his post as a rant. He does like to troll (or stirr things up), but not in this message.
I find it curious where the logic is in giving your opinion that he shouldn't give his opinion.
Sad attitude Posted Jan 6, 2012 0:05 UTC (Fri) by steffen780 (guest, #68142) [Link]
Difference is that I'm not advocating to give up on cooperation - Lennard is. Or at least I don't see how his words could be interpreted any other way, but if I misunderstood him I'm sorry (should've said that in my previous post ofc). If anything there needs to be a lot more cooperation, and not less, to reduce the insane amount of duplication.
As for logic, well, I fully support his right to say what he wants. I also fully support taking some care in what one says, especially when it's on the record and on an extremely touchy subject. I don't see what's illogical about that.
|
|||||||||||||