Re: LTTng driver submission for staging (2nd attempt)
[Posted December 14, 2011 by corbet]
| From: |
| Greg KH <greg-AT-kroah.com> |
| To: |
| Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-AT-efficios.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: LTTng driver submission for staging (2nd attempt) |
| Date: |
| Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:07:57 +0900 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20111129010757.GA3123__32533.7451570251$1322544148$gmane$org@kroah.com> |
| Cc: |
| devel-AT-driverdev.osuosl.org, lttng-dev-AT-lists.lttng.org |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:42:07AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> This a resend of the LTTng driver patchset for staging. After your
> review of the first round, I proceeded to the following modifications:
>
> - Understood that git format-patch must be given the commit prior to the
> first commit to include in the patchset as first commit ID, this
> adding the missing 0001-lttng-lib-lttng-priority-heap.patch. (cause of
> the build failure)
> - Added missing (empty) system call instrumentation "override" files,
> that were known to git, but discarded by git format-patch. Made sure
> they appear in the patches as place-holders by adding a comment in
> those files.
> - Removed gpl*.txt/lgpl*.txt license files.
> - Removed Changelog.
> - Added TODO file.
> - While going through the TODO, I noticed that I needed to fix the
> syscall TRACE_EVENT generation scripts (along with the headers
> generated) to complete support of 32-bit compat syscalls on x86-64. I
> did these modifications.
> - Tested the build on x86-64/x86-32, and run-time tested on x86-32,
> using the patchset rather than the git tree commits to ensure you
> won't run into any issues on your side.
Nice, that worked, all now applied.
greg k-h
(
Log in to post comments)