| |||||||||||||
Press releasesPress releasesPosted Dec 8, 2011 12:07 UTC (Thu) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)In reply to: Press releases by ekj Parent article: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.2 released
Your grade in physics, should reflect your demonstrated skill in physics. Language is a nessecary [sic] component of that, because it's what you use to demonstrate skill. But other than that, it should not matter. I could not disagree more strongly. In just about every job I've worked at, communication skills were vital. Even in technical fields like computer programming, being able to communicate with other people is supremely important. And if you interact with customers, poor spelling and poor grammar reflect very badly on your employer.
(Log in to post comments)
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 12:19 UTC (Thu) by ekj (guest, #1524) [Link]
Communication is more than written English, it may not even happen in English at all.
Furthermore, it's fine for lots of employers to care about your English-grade. If they care about that, let them look at that.
Why force everyone, even the people who do -not- care about English-skill, to consider it anyway, because you put some fraction of it into every other grade ?
I'm not saying English-skill should not count. For a lot of jobs, especially in English-speaking countries, it obviously should count for a lot. I'm saying that your level of English-skill, should be reflected in your *English* grade.
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 12:30 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
it's not your english that's being graded in these other classes, it's your capability to communicate clearly and unambiguously.
we've all seen the humorous results of computer spelling and grammar checkers, where the computer has 'corrected' something so that the statement now means something completely different.
not correcting it means that you are playing russian roulette with your communication. It may mean what you intended it to mean, but it may not, and you don't know enough to realize this.
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 12:53 UTC (Thu) by ekj (guest, #1524) [Link]
I already said that:
If the answer is not understandable, then obviously points are subtracted, but even then you don't subtract for poor english, you subtract for the fact that the student did not succeed in demonstrating knowledge of the subject area.
So yes, obviously. If your English is such that it prevents you from communicating clearly and precisely about the subject-area, then you will indeed get a poorer grade, and that's perfectly fair. In that case you're not being punished for poor English as such. You're being given a lower grade because you did not succeed in demonstrating that you deserve the higher grade. (you use English for this demonstration)
I also picked examples specifically to not fall under this. If I write an answer about optics, and write about refraction of ligth instead of refraction of light, then it's perfectly clear what I mean, and I should get full credits. (not "minus a few percent")
Most minor mistakes in spelling and/or grammar fall in this category, for example in this very thread, we have one commenter who says he suffered because of differences between New Zealand and US english. Giving someone a lower grade in physics, math or history on account of "uses New Zealand spelling" is nonsense.
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 13:21 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
the problem is that in english, many misspellings of one word end up being a different word, which can change the meaning.
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 12:42 UTC (Thu) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] Once you're past elementary school, your grades in English are unlikely to be based only on your mastery of English spelling, grammar and vocabulary. It turns out that the farther you advance in your education, the more English classes tend to be about things like literature, cultural history, and philosophy, and the more actual command of the English language becomes part of the »infrastructure« which is as essential to taking part in these classes as it is in math, science, or history classes. Given this, if you're in charge of the school system and it is important to you that students have good English, it doesn't make sense to penalise people for language mistakes only in advanced English classes but not in the other subjects. (People from countries where English is not the primary language tend to disregard this since their English classes tend to be much more focused on the language as such. Just substitute your primary language for »English« in the paragraphs above.)
Press releases Posted Dec 8, 2011 15:38 UTC (Thu) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Communication is more than written English, it may not even happen in English at all. Feel free to substitute $YOUR_NATIVE_LANGUAGE for English in my arguments. Why force everyone, even the people who do -not- care about English-skill, to consider it anyway, because you put some fraction of it into every other grade ? Because communication in $YOUR_NATIVE_LANGUAGE is vital. You can be a brilliant physicist, but if you can't communicate your ideas and discoveries, your brilliance is wasted. I'm saying that your level of English-skill, should be reflected in your *English* grade. Yes, of course. But if your communication skills in $YOUR_NATIVE_LANGUAGE are poor, you should lose some marks in all subjects that require communication in $YOUR_NATIVE_LANGUAGE.
|
|||||||||||||