| |||||||||||||
extensions.gnome.org launchesextensions.gnome.org launchesPosted Dec 7, 2011 4:21 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)In reply to: extensions.gnome.org launches by mjg59 Parent article: extensions.gnome.org launches
That's the intent or the fact?
It seems like you could have a videocard and correct opengl driver that offers to do the operations but doesn't offer the performance. How is the capability tested?
(Log in to post comments)
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 4:28 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
How many opengl drivers do you think exist without the ability to scale textures?
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:24 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
For what size textures?
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:38 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
2048x2048 on Intel <965 and Radeon <r500, 4096x4096 on everything else as far as I know.
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:48 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
There exists a whole range of hardware that never could handle textures over 256x256.
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:53 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
I'm sure. I'm also sure that you're not running Gnome Shell on it.
|
|||||||||||||