| |||||||||||||
extensions.gnome.org launchesextensions.gnome.org launchesPosted Dec 5, 2011 12:06 UTC (Mon) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)In reply to: extensions.gnome.org launches by dgm Parent article: extensions.gnome.org launches
If you don't have the right graphics driver with the right gpu, then right now you're not running Gnome Shell.
(Log in to post comments)
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 4:21 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
That's the intent or the fact?
It seems like you could have a videocard and correct opengl driver that offers to do the operations but doesn't offer the performance. How is the capability tested?
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 4:28 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
How many opengl drivers do you think exist without the ability to scale textures?
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:24 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
For what size textures?
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:38 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
2048x2048 on Intel <965 and Radeon <r500, 4096x4096 on everything else as far as I know.
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:48 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
There exists a whole range of hardware that never could handle textures over 256x256.
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 7, 2011 20:53 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
I'm sure. I'm also sure that you're not running Gnome Shell on it.
|
|||||||||||||