Posted Dec 4, 2011 2:25 UTC (Sun) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
In reply to: QEMU 1.0 released by SEJeff
Parent article: QEMU 1.0 released
Well seeing how KVM uses Qemu (I think Xen can use it also, haven't kept up with Xen stuff) I would certainly hope it is as capable as Qemu standalone.
I have used Qemu for some minimal cross-platform Linux development for ARM on Debian using my x86 laptop, but it was a while ago and I don't remember the details.
Posted Dec 4, 2011 14:34 UTC (Sun) by aliguori (subscriber, #30636)
[Link]
Xen uses QEMU as the device model with any HVM guest.
QEMU 1.0 released
Posted Dec 4, 2011 20:05 UTC (Sun) by jnguyen (guest, #72727)
[Link]
The relatively new KVM (native) is different from the KVM (based on Qemu) that most Linux users are familiar with, and I think the latter is the one that drag was referring to. I believe the native KVM was written from scratch and so has not much to do with the KVM based on Qemu.
And these are different again from the KVM (switch) that has been around for even longer. I do wish they picked different names.
QEMU 1.0 released
Posted Dec 4, 2011 20:56 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
And, of course, the KVM kernel component is used both by the new KVM tool and by qemu-kvm.
QEMU 1.0 released
Posted Dec 5, 2011 10:26 UTC (Mon) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]
People are getting very nit picky.
Yeah sure you can use something other then Qemu with KVM, but the Qemu + KVM is what people are going to be generally using at this time.
QEMU 1.0 released
Posted Dec 5, 2011 12:16 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Yes. What I was really nitpicking at was people who said that QEMU was used by KVM. As with any kernel service, it's the other way around!